Creation of Earth, Time, and Time Travel.

We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Creation of Earth, Time, and Time Travel.
Topic Started: Nov 28 2009, 02:02 AM (250 Views)
Earendel	Nov 28 2009, 02:02 AM Post #1
Advanced Member Posts: 479 Group: Members Member #5,114 Joined: July 29, 2009	I am going to touch on many areas with this post; the point is to show you that time is relative. What I am about to post here is the result of much study over a very long period of time, and is a culmination of many posts that I have made on this topic. If a person wants to be a literalist, that is to say that a day is 24 hours, then creation took place in 6 days or 144 hours of time. We know for certain that from the creation of Adam, there has been approximately 6000 years that has transpired. The days in creation as written in Genisis may very well be periods of time spanning several billions of years. Some may have a hard time understanding this, but to a timeless, ageless being such as our Creator, time is nothing... a billion years may as well be 24 hours when it passes. There is an example in creation that God has given us to help us understand the concept of eternity, and we can plainly see this by what we observe. It helps us to understand how God Himself is eternal without beginning and without end. So here are some questions. Is there an end to space? Is there an end to the universe as we see it when we look up into the skies? When the first star was born, what was in the expanse of the heavens? We can see that eveything was formless and void. How many universes has there been in eons past? At the end of our known universe, where the first/last star exists, what lies beyond it in the sea of timeless space? ...another shore? ...the expanse of formless and void space once again? Travel a trillion^trillionth power light years in one direction in a straight line and do we yet find yet another universe, and so on and so on? These are things we can acknowledge because we see the stars in the expanse of space to give it perception and depth. By what we observe we perceive the expanse of space and understand what eternity is, and thereby can understand that God Himself can be and most certainly is eternal. He made all things that exist, including our consciousness and understanding. Of the vastness of all of creation and of eternity itself, did you know that God has to humble Himself to look at it all? Psalm 113:5-6 5 Who is like the LORD our God, Who dwells on high, 6 Who humbles Himself to behold The things that are in the heavens and in the earth? It does not matter to me if creation occured in 144 hours of our time or not; I believe God could have done it in a pico-second if He so wanted to. ...because He does not exist in our realm and is all powerful beyond our understanding. Let me try and explain time. Time can be controlled and manipulated...understand the event horizon of a black hole for an example of this. I won't delve into the physics aspect of space/time relativity and gravity here at this time. But think about this one though...Without mass there is no gravity, without gravity there is no time...just the emptiness of space in a timeless ether. Did you know that time can be controlled...even by us? Take the the time to read through this link so I don't have to copy and paste large volumes. link: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/hotsciencetwin/#game From the experiment in the link provided above, it has been determined that time travels at different rates of speed depending on the slowing of time due to motion. So, can the universe occur in a second? The point being is that time is nothing to God our Father, the Creator of the Universe. He could have created the entire universe or ALL things in 144 hours or six days. So, that leaves a question...is the Earth 4 billion years old or is it 6000 years old when time dilation is considered? I believe both are correct at the same time, depending on where you exist in time. So is FTL travel possible within the framework of general relativity and without the introduction of wormholes? Science seems to think so, but not much of this is talked about publicly. Start here:http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013 ...However, just as it happens with wormholes, exotic matter will be needed in order to generate a distortion of spacetime like the one discussed here. I believe they have it. Shelby et. al.: "Experimental Verification of a Negative Index of Refraction" see: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/292/5514/77 and http://people.ee.duke.edu/~drsmith/pubs_smith_group/Shelby_Science_(2001).pdf ...the exotic material needed for superluminal travel, actually it is a new form of mass called metamaterial, ...read about it here: http://tinyurl.com/3x5ynj So, what does this mean? Cloaking, antigravty... use this metamaterial to levitate objects. Two metal plates are very close to each other attract (the Casimir effect). But if one has negative permittivity and permeability, then a repulsion is possible. Hence you affect gravitational fields...Micro-and nano-mechanical meatmaterials that are sensitive to the Casimir force effect gravity, effect time. Certain classes of higher dimensional models suggest that the Casimir Effect is a candidate for the cosmological constant. In this paper we demonstrate that a sufficiently advanced civilization could, in principal, manipulate the radius of the extra dimension to locally adjust the value of the cosmological constant. This adjustment could be tuned to generate an expansion/contraction of spacetime around a spacecraft creating an exotic form of field-propulsion. Due to the fact that spacetime expansion itself is not restricted by relativity, a faster-than-light 'warp drive' could be created. Calculations of the energy requirements of such a drive are performed and an 'ultimate' speed limit, based on the Planckian limits on the size of the extra dimensions is found. Source: http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0712/0712.1649v2.pdf Awww yes, the warp bubble... as in : http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013 ...don't forget the exotic matter that you will need in order to generate a distortion of spacetime as in: http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0034-4885/68/2/R06/ Did you know that, yes, it is true that the "negative solutions" to Maxwell's equations actually leads to fantastic new materials with negative refractive indices. These materials are called matematerials, as they are not conventional materials with atoms as a building blocks of some lattice but manufactured lattice of nano-structures with suitable geometry. You can check these pages for introduction: http://www.aph.kit.edu/wegener/ http://www.aph.kit.edu/wegener/en/research/metamaterials http://physics.ucsd.edu/lhmedia/ That was a little bit of some of the research I have conducted as a hobby. Now we have to ask the question: How much of this is God going to let man get away with? We are talking about interplanetary travel to other star systems, and this is NOT sci-fi anymore. God gave man dominion over this planet, not over others. This is another reason why I believe we are close to the end now. God will intervene to stop any more. ...but it is not finished here. Someone may argue Concerning the warp drive. But I think they need to figure out a way to make the human body able to tolerate such a speed first, because right now we can't. The G forces would kill a human being. My response NO G's are involved. Space is warped in front and behind craft, and the crew would experience no accelerational g-forces. The craft actually doesn't move, but space does around you. Imagine a destination that is 700 light years away being a piece of paper...want to travel the distance, just fold the paper in half and bring the destination to you. It is shown how, within the framework of general relativity and without the introduction of wormholes, it is possible to modify a spacetime in a way that allows a spaceship to travel with an arbitrarily large speed. By a purely local expansion of spacetime behind the spaceship and an opposite contraction in front of it, motion faster than the speed of light as seen by observers outside the disturbed region is possible. The resulting distortion is reminiscent of the`warp drive' of science fiction. However, just as it happens with wormholes. Instead of shunting the ship into a higher-dimensional continuum like hyperdrives, warp drives instead bend the space-time of our own universe around the ship. This creates a region of subjective space-time that is out of synch with the rest of the universe. Einstein's Theory of Relativity clearly demonstrates that no physical object can travel faster than light. However, how fast spacetime itself can move in relation to itself is unknown, and can theoretically be moved at any speed. Because it is "detached" from normal space, a region of warped spacetime--including any ship within it--can be moved faster than light. At least this is the theory behind it. Ben Rich, who headed up Lockheed Skunk Works... said "We already have the means to take ET home. But like I already said, God did not give man dominion over other planets, and since we are very close to this happening now, I believe that God is going to step in and intervene. The scientist who told me about the metamaterial is the same one who told me that he has seen this thing...Not much more I want tell about that. ~~~ Now that the Hadron Collider is up and running at CERN, so things look to move forward to, or not... ...the Russians argue that when the energies of the LHC are concentrated into a subatomic particle - a trillionth the size of a mosquito - they can do strange things to the fabric of the universe, which is a blend of space and time that scientists called spacetime. While Earth's gravity produces gentle distortions in spacetime the LHC energy can distort time so much that it loops back on itself. These loops are known to physicists as "closed timelike curves" and they ought, at least in theory, to allow us to revisit some past moment. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/3324491/Time-travellers-from-the-future-could-be-here-in-weeks.html It will occur here: http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/LHC-en.html Is there perhaps something satanically inspired about this LHC at CERN? I think there is. I have often wondered why they are creating this machine. They spend Billions of dollars to make it, and for what purpose? ...to collide some atoms together to see what happens? What a foolish waste of money...or is it? Why would scientists want to create a gravity well of such proportions, so as to unleash another dimension into ours? ...You read that correctly... that is exactly what this super-collider does. See here: High energy collisions by the nearly-completed Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may be able to generate particles that are sensitive to dimensions beyond our four dimensional space-time. ...read it here: LINK This is so much more then just viewing a black hole, but peering into the unknown and unseen universe - other dimensions - other unknown universes - and perhaps other creatures. I believe there is something a lot more sinister, and satanically inspired to it then just exploring a black hole. Why would satan want to inspire this super-collider anyway? A Black Hole = The Bottomless Pit I do not believe this is a metaphor that the bible speaks about, but actual events to come - as written about in the book of Revelations ...which makes me wonder about the CERN LHC and THIS ...opening another dimension into ours may very well invite... THESE The opening of a "bottomless pit" (Black Hole?) here on Earth...was prophesied about in the book of Revelations: And he opened the bottomless pit, and smoke arose out of the pit like the smoke of a great furnace. So the sun and the air were darkened because of the smoke of the pit. Revelation 9:2 The Releasing of Abaddon, the Scorpion King
	Repentance is a rocky road best travelled in the day, when there is light, lest darkness comes, and I stumble in the dark...that is to say the Spirit of God will not always strive with man. I will therefore humble myself before the God of heaven and pray, who has called me with a holy calling...to walk this road of repentance..that leads to eternal life. My Webpage


Israeli	Nov 28 2009, 04:50 AM Post #2
Advanced Member Posts: 1,731 Group: Advanced Members Member #1,064 Joined: April 29, 2007	Wow! I sent this article of yours to my DH. His nephew works at CERN.



OnTheHorizon	Nov 29 2009, 01:53 AM Post #3
Advanced Member Posts: 1,338 Group: Advanced Members Member #58 Joined: November 9, 2005	Really interesting. Thanks for sharing.



Rog	Dec 1 2009, 01:19 AM Post #4
Advanced Member Posts: 580 Group: Advanced Members Member #174 Joined: May 12, 2006	The element of time and space is certainly a fascinating one. Though concerning creation, the Bible says, evening and morning the next day. So I must believe, creation was literal 24 hour days, like we experience today. My understanding of time is that the speed of light is the clock cycle, so to speak, which the universe is governed by. Ironically, we travel at the speed of light or near it already. Considering that the earth is rotating, and it is orbiting our Sun, which orbits a black hole, which orbits a quasar, that orbits the nuclear center of the galaxy. It turn our galaxy orbits another massive black hole, which may orbit a nuclear center of our universe. So already, we are all whirling through space at a tremendous speed just sitting there reading this. The faster we travel, the more time is actually reduced. The faster we travel, the slower time is, because our speed is actually subtracted, not added to the timespace continuum. Einstein suggested that if we were to travel faster than the speed of light, we would travel backwards in time. To travel at the speed of light, time would stand still. So, in essence, the faster you go, the slower you are actually moving through the continuum. Say you were on a very long escalator, the escalator represents time. Then you start to walk the opposite direction the escalator is moving. If you walked at the same speed the escalator moved, you would stay in the same spot and not move. If you were to walk faster than the escalator moves, you would then start going in the opposite direction. Such is time and space.



OnTheHorizon	Dec 1 2009, 05:30 PM Post #5
Advanced Member Posts: 1,338 Group: Advanced Members Member #58 Joined: November 9, 2005	Chuck Missler has some excellent material on this subject. He does a good job explaining it in layman's terms also. I was listening to Jack Van Impe yesterday and heard him say something about the 7 days of creation equals 7000 years because the Bible says 1 day is as 1000 years. I thought he made and interesting point but I still believe it's a literal 7 day creation. I wonder if there is a 7000 year thing that would tie into it as well.



Shershalom	Dec 2 2009, 10:04 AM Post #6
Advanced Member Posts: 1,023 Group: Advanced Members Member #810 Joined: March 20, 2007	I found this gentlemen's article interesting regarding the Age of the Universe. He essentially says that the 6 days of creation + the present 6000 years of time = the 14 / 15 billion year dating of the universe that our scientists claim. Please note this gentlemen, although believes in God and that there was a beginning, he is not YET a believer in Messiah, he is a scientist, and quotes a lot from historical, scientific & commentaries as resources. http://www.geraldschroeder.com/AgeUniverse.aspx The Age of the Universe by Gerald Schroeder One of the most obvious perceived contradictions between Torah and science is the age of the universe. Is it billions of years old, like scientific data, or is it thousands of years, like Biblical data? When we add up the generations of the Bible, we come to fewer than 6000 years. Whereas, data from the Hubbell telescope or from the land based telescopes in Hawaii, indicate the number at 15 billion years plus or minus 10%. In trying to resolve this apparent conflict, I use only ancient biblical commentary because modern commentary already knows modern science, and so it is influenced by that science always. That means the text of the Bible itself (3300 years ago), the translation of the Torah into Aramaic by Onkelos (100 CE), the Talmud (redacted about the year 400 CE), and the three major Torah commentators. There are many, many commentators, but at the top of the mountain there are three, accepted by all: Rashi (11th century France), who brings the straight understanding of the text, Maimonides (12th century Egypt), who handles the philosophical concepts, and then Nahmanides (13th century Spain), the most important of the Kabbalists. This ancient commentary was finalized hundreds or thousands of years ago, long before Hubbell was a gleam in his great-grandparent's eye. So there's no possibility of Hubbell or any other scientific data influencing these concepts. That's a key component in my attempt to keep the following discussion objective. Universe with a Beginning In 1959, a survey was taken of leading American scientists. Among the many questions asked was, "What is your concept of the age of the universe?" Now, in 1959, astronomy was popular, but cosmology - the deep physics of understanding the universe - was just developing. The response to that survey was recently republished in Scientific American - the most widely read science journal in the world. Two-thirds of the scientists gave the same answer. The answer that two-thirds - an overwhelming majority - of the scientists gave was, "Beginning? There was no beginning. Aristotle and Plato taught us 2400 years ago that the universe is eternal. Oh, we know the Bible says 'In the beginning.' That's a nice story, it helps kids go to bed at night. But we sophisticates know better. There was no beginning." That was 1959. In 1965, Penzias and Wilson discovered the echo of the Big Bang in the black of the sky at night, and the world paradigm changed from a universe that was eternal to a universe that had a beginning. Science had made an enormous paradigm change in its understanding of the world. Understand the impact. Science said that our universe had a beginning. I can't overestimate the import of that scientific "discovery." Evolution, cave men, these are all trivial problems compared to the fact that we now understand that we had a beginning. Of course, the fact that there was a beginning does not prove that there was a beginner. Whether the second half of Genesis 1:1 is correct, we don't know from a secular point of view. The first half is "In the beginning;" the second half is "G-d created the Heavens and the Earth." Physics allows for a beginning without a beginner. I'm not going to get into that today, but my new book, "The Science of G-d," examines this in great detail. It All Starts From Rosh Hashana The question we're left with is, how long ago did the "beginning" occur? Was it, as the Bible might imply, 5758 years, or was it the 15 billions of years that's accepted by the scientific community? The first thing we have to understand is the origin of the Biblical calendar. The Jewish year, 5758 years, is figured by adding up the generations since Adam. Additionally, there are six days leading up to the creation to Adam. These six days are significant as well. (My note: The present jewish year is at 5770, so this article was written about 12 years ago.) Of course, the fact that there was a beginning does not prove that there was a beginner. Whether the second half of Genesis 1:1 is correct, that "G-d created the Heavens and the Earth" Physics allows for a beginning without a beginner. I'm not going to get into that today, but my new book, "The Science of God," examines this in great detail. It all starts from Rosh HaShanah. The question we're left with is, how long ago did the "beginning" occur? Was it, as the Bible might imply, fewer than 6000 years or was it the 15 billions of years? The first thing we have to understand is the Biblical calendar. The Jewish year is calculated by adding up the generations since Adam. Additionally, there are six days from the creation of the universe to the creation of the first human, that is the first being with the soul of a human (not the first hominid, a being with human shape and intelligence, but lacking the soul of humanity, the neshama). We have a 6000 year clock that begins with Adam. The six days are separate from this clock. The Bible has two clocks. This is no modern rationalization. The Talmud already discussed this 1600 years ago. The reason the six pre-Adam days were taken out of the calendar is because time is described differently in those Six Days of Genesis. "There was evening and morning" with no relationship to human time. Once we come from Adam, the flow of time is totally in human terms. Adam and Eve live 130 years before having Seth. Seth lives 105 years before having Enosh, etc. (Genesis chapter 5). From Adam forward, the flow of time is totally human in concept. But prior to that time, it's an abstract concept: "Evening and morning." It's as if you're looking down on events from a viewpoint that is not intimately related to them, a cosmic view of time. Looking Deeper into the Text In trying to understand the flow of time here, you have to remember that the entire Six Days is described in 31 sentences. The Six Days of Genesis, which have given people so many headaches are confined to 31 sentences! At MIT, in the Hayden library, we had about 50,000 books that deal with the development of the universe: cosmology, chemistry, thermodynamics, paleontology, archaeology, the high-energy physics of creation. Up the river at Harvard, at the Weidner library, they probably have 200,000 books on these same topics. The Bible gives us 31 sentences. Don't expect that by a simple reading of those sentences, you'll know every detail that is held within the text. It's obvious that we have to dig deeper to get the information out. What is a "day?" The usual answer to that is let the word day in Genesis chapter one be any long period of time. Bend the Bible to match the science. Fortunately, the Talmud in Hagigah (12A), Rashi there and Nahmanides (Gen. 1:3) all tell us that the word day means 24 hours. But the commentary continues in Exodus and Leviticus, that the days are 24 hours each (not relating to sunrise and sunset, merely sets of 24 hours). There are six of them, and the duration is not longer than the six days of a work week, BUT contain all the ages of the world. How can six 24 hour days contain all the ages of the world? Einstein taught the world that time is relative. That in regions of high velocity or high gravity time actually passes more slowly relative to regions of lower gravity or lower velocity. (One system relative to another, hence the name, the laws of relativity) This is now proven fact. Time actually stretches out. Were ever you are time is normal for you because your biology is part of that local system. That is Einstein and gravity and velocity. But there is a third aspect of the universe that changes the perception of time, Not gravity and not velocity. That is the stretching of space. The universe started as a minuscule speck, perhaps not larger that a grain of mustard and stretched out from there. Space actually stretches. The effect of the stretching of space produces the effect that when observing an event that took place far from our galaxy, as the light from that event travels through space and the sequence of events travels through space, the information is actually stretched out. (In The Science of God I give the logic in detail in simple easy to understand terms.) The Creation of Time Each day of creation is numbered. Yet there is discontinuity in the way the days are numbered. The verse says: "There is evening and morning, Day One." But the second day doesn't say "evening and morning, Day Two." Rather, it says "evening and morning, a second day." And the Torah continues with this pattern: "Evening and morning, a third day... a fourth day... a fifth day... the sixth day." Only on the first day does the text use a different form: not "first day," but "Day One" ("Yom Echad"). Many English translations that make the mistake of writing "a first day." That's because editors want things to be nice and consistent. But they throw out the cosmic message in the text! Because there is a qualitative difference, as Nahmanides says, between "one" and "first." One is absolute; first is comparative. The Torah could not write �a first day� one the first day because there had not yet been a second day relative to it. Had the perspective of the Bible for the first six days been from Sinai looking back, the Torah would have written a first day. The perspective of the Bible for the six days of Genesis is from the beginning looking forward. At the creation of Adam and Eve, the soul of humanity, the Bible perspective switches to earth based time. Einstein's Law of Relativity We look at the universe, and say, "How old is the universe? Looking back in time, the universe is approximately 15 billion years old." That's our view of time. But what is the Bible's view of time looking from the beginning? How does it see time? Nahmanides taught that although the days are 24 hours each, they contain "kol yemot ha-olam" - all the ages and all the secrets of the world. Nahmanides says that before the universe, there was nothing... but then suddenly the entire creation appeared as a minuscule speck. He gives a dimension for the speck: something very tiny smaller than a grain of mustard. And he says that is the only physical creation. There was no other physical creation; all other creations were spiritual. The Nefesh (the soul of animal life) and the Neshama (the soul of human life) are spiritual creations. There's only one physical creation, and that creation was a tiny speck. In that speck was all the raw material that would be used for making everything else. Nahmanides describes the substance as "dak me'od, ein bo mamash" - very thin, no substance to it. And as this speck expanded out, this substance - so thin that it has no essence - turned into matter as we know it. Nahmanides further writes: "Misheyesh, yitfos bo zman" - from the moment that matter formed from this substance-less substance, time grabs hold. Not "begins." Time is created at the beginning. But time "grabs hold." When matter condenses, congeals, coalesces, out of this substance so thin it has no essence - that's when the Biblical clock starts. Science has shown that there's only one "substanceless substance" that can change into matter. And that's energy. Einstein's famous equation, E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold. Nahmanides has made a phenomenal statement. I don't know if he knew the Laws of Relativity. But we know them now. We know that energy - light beams, radio waves, gamma rays, x-rays - all travel at the speed of light, 300 million meters per second. At the speed of light, time does not pass. The universe was aging, but time only grabs hold when matter is present. This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible, lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A miniscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck, to about the size of the Solar System. From that moment on we have matter, and time flows forward. The clock begins here. Einstein's Law of Relativity (cont'd) Now the fact that the Bible tells us there is "evening and morning Day One", comes to teach us time from a Biblical perspective, from near the beginning looking forward. Now if the Torah were seeing time from the days of Moses on Mount Sinai - long after Adam - the text would not have written Day One. Because by Sinai, hundreds of thousands of days already passed. It would have said "A first day." By the second day of Genesis, the Bible says "a second day," because there was already the first day with which to compare it. Even if the Torah was seeing time from Adam, the text would have said "a first day", because by its own statement there are six days. The Torah says "Day One" because the Torah is looking forward from the beginning. And it says, how old is the universe till Adam? Six Days. We look back in time, and say the universe is 15 billion years old. But every scientist knows, that when we say the universe is 15 billion years old, there's another half of the sentence that we never say. The other half of the sentence is: The universe is 15 billion years old as seen from the time-space coordinates that we exist in. The key is that the Torah looks forward in time, from very different time-space coordinates, when the universe was small. But since then, the universe has expanded out. Space stretches, and that stretching of space totally changes the perception of time. Imagine in your mind going back billions of years ago to the beginning of time. Now pretend way back at the beginning of time, when time grabs hold, there's an intelligent community. (It's totally fictitious.) Imagine that the intelligent community has a laser, and it's going to shoot out a blast of light every second. Every second -- pulse. Pulse. Pulse. And on each pulse of light the following formation is printed (printing information on light, electro-magnetic radiation, is common practice): "I'm sending you a pulse every second." Billions of years later, way far down the time line, we here on Earth have a big satellite dish and we receive that pulse of light. And on that pulse of light we read "I'm sending you a pulse every second." Light travels 300 million meters per second. So at the beginning, the two light pulses are separated by a second of travel or 300 million meters. Now they travel through space for billions of years until they reach the Earth. But wait a minute. Is the universe static? No. The universe is expanding. The universe expands by space stretching. So as these pulses travel through space for billions of years, space is stretching. What's happening to these pulses? The space between them is also stretching. So the pulses really get further and further apart. Billions of years later, when the first pulse arrives, we read on it "I'm sending you a pulse every second." A message from outer space. You call all your friends, and you wait for the next pulse to arrive. Does it arrive second later? No! A year later? Maybe not. Maybe billions of years later. Because the amount of time this pulse of light has traveled through space will determine the amount of space stretching that has occurred, and so how much time there will be between the arrival of the pulses. That's standard cosmology. 15 billion or six days? Today, we look back in time and we see approximately 15 billion years of history. Looking forward from when the universe is very small - billions of times smaller - the Torah says six days. In truth, they both may be correct. What's exciting about the last few years in cosmology is we now have quantified the data to know the relationship of the "view of time" from the beginning of stable matter, the threshold energy of protons and neutrons (their nucleosynthesis), relative to the "view of time" today. It's not science fiction any longer. A dozen physics textbooks all bring the same number. The general relationship between time near the beginning and time today is a million million. That's a 1 with 12 zeros after it. So when a view from the beginning looking forward says "I'm sending you a pulse every second," would we see it every second? No. We'd see it every million million seconds. Because that's the stretching effect of the expansion of the universe. The Talmud tells us that the soul of Adam was created at five and a half days after the beginning of the calendar. That is a half day before the termination of the sixth day. At that moment the cosmic calendar ceases and an earth based calendar starts. . How would we see those days stretched by a million million? The million million expansion of five and a half days gives an age of the universe as 15 billion years. NASA gives a value of about 14 billion years. Considering the many approximations, and that the Bible works with only six periods of time, the agreement to within a few percent is in my opinion extraordinary. The five and a half days of Genesis are not of equal duration. Each time the universe doubles in size, the perception of time halves as we project that time back toward the beginning of the universe. The rate of doubling, that is the fractional rate of change, is very rapid at the beginning and decreases with time simply because as the universe gets larger and larger, even though the actual expansion rate is approximately constant, it takes longer and longer for the overall size to double. Because of this, the earliest of the six days have most of the15 billion years sequestered with them. For the duration of each day and the details of how that matches with the measured history of the universe and the earth, see The Science of God. Science has shown that there's only one "substanceless substance" that can change into matter. And that's energy. Einstein's famous equation, E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold. Nahmanides has made a phenomenal statement. I don't know if he knew the Laws of Relativity. But we know them now. We know that energy - light beams, radio waves, gamma rays, x-rays - all travel at the speed of light, 300 million meters per second. At the speed of light, time does not pass. The universe was aging, but time only grabs hold when matter is present. This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible, lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A miniscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck, to about the size of the Solar System. From that moment on we have matter, and time flows forward. The clock begins here.
	SherShalom "Blessed is HE that comes in the name of YHVH." MATTHEW 23:39


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Endtime Chat · Next Topic »